Xpansion Micro-Autografting Kit Clinical evidence & reviews Below is a list of selected publications that support the clinical efectiveness of the Xpansion® device. Hackl, F, et al. Epidermal Regeneration by Micrograft Transplantation with Immediate 100-Fold Expansion. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, March 2012,129(3):443e-452e Singh Mansher et al. Innovations in Caring for a Large Burn in the Iraq War Zone. Journal of Burn Care & Research. July/August 2010. Vol. 31, No. 4. Danks RR. A Novel skin grafting technique with 1:100 expansion: Xpansion Micrografting system. Journal of Wound Technology. No.27 January 2015: 14-18 Svensjo T, et al. Autologous skin transplantation: comparison of minced skin to other techniques. J Surg Res. 2002;103(1):19-29. Other Micrografting or “Meek” Technique Nelson CV, et al. Micrografts II: Evaluation of 25:1, 50:1, and 100:1 expansion skin grafts in the porcine model. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995;16:31-5. Medina Abelardo, Rigel Timothy et al. Modified Meek technique for wound coverage in extensive burn injuries J Burn Care Res 2016;37:305–313 Pertusi G, et al. Selective release of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors by minced skin in vitro supports the effectiveness of autologous minced micrografts technique for chronic ulcer repair. Wound Repair Regen. 2012 Mar-Apr;20(2):178-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00762.x. Epub 2012 Feb 3. Boggio P, et al. Is there an easier way to autograft skin in chronic leg ulcers? ‘Minced micrografts’, a new technique. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Nov;22(10):1168-72. Epub 2008 Apr 10. Biswas A, Bharara M, Hurst C, Armstrong DG, Rilo H. The micrograft concept for wound healing: strategies and applications. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):808-19.